IELTS Writing Process 2 Pattern Essay: Environmental Issues
On this put up, I’m going to write down an IELTS Writing Process 2 mannequin essay in response to this query about environmental issues from Cambridge 14 (Educational):
It’s best to spend about 40 minutes on this job.
Write concerning the following matter:
Some folks say that the primary environmental downside of our time is the loss of explicit species of crops and animals. Others say that there are extra necessary environmental issues.
Focus on each these views and provides your individual opinion.
Give causes on your reply and embody any related examples from your individual data or expertise.
Write at the least 250 phrases.
Initially, I’ll take you thru my 4 Step Method to essay planning:
- Analyse The Query
- Resolve My Place
- Generate My Concepts
- Develop My Concepts
Step 1: Analyse The Query
The very first thing to do is analyse the query. A method of doing that is to (VERY fastidiously) simplify the query. On this query, I feel the simplified query is that this:
What’s a very powerful environmental downside? Is it species loss…or one thing else?
We will additionally simplify the two views:
View 1: species loss is the primary environmental downside.
View 2: there are “extra necessary” ones.
What would possibly these “extra necessary” environmental issues be? World warming involves my thoughts.
Step 2: Resolve My Place
So, what do I REALLY take into consideration this challenge? In different phrases, what’s my place on this challenge?
I feel species loss is a serious downside, however I feel world warming is the extra necessary one. Nevertheless, I feel the 2 issues are linked: my understanding is that world warming will result in species loss anyway; if world warming causes species loss, it is sensible that world warming is the larger downside.
Step 3: Generate My Concepts
Subsequent, I have to generate some concepts for this essay.
I need to additionally keep in mind that the query is asking about environmental PROBLEMS, not options.
View 1: species loss is fundamental environmental downside.
Nicely, I agree it’s necessary. Why do I feel this?
- necessary to guard species – we share the world – ethical obligation
- additionally lack of species impacts people (e.g. impacts meals chain, lack of fish in seas means much less meals for us)
View 2: there are “extra necessary” issues.
I feel world warming is a extra necessary downside. Why do I feel this?
- hazard that world warming will escalate and result in runaway warming
- finally this may result in species loss anyway
Step 4: Develop My Concepts
Subsequent, I’m going to develop my concepts utilizing a logical construction. This may give me a transparent essay plan.
Introduction:
- species loss a serious concern, however is it fundamental one?
Physique Paragraph 1
- Principal Thought: ethical obligation to guard species
- Rationalization: lack of species is everlasting, future generations
- Instance: dodo
Physique Paragraph 2
- Principal Thought: lack of species impacts people
- Rationalization: meals and medicines
Physique Paragraph 3
- Principal Thought: world warming is extra necessary
- Rationalization: runaway heating will result in extra issues, together with species loss
- Instance: polar bears
Conclusion
- each are necessary, however world warming will trigger species loss, so it’s a very powerful downside.
I made a decision to write down 2 separate paragraphs in my dialogue of the primary thought – it appears extra logical to do that.
So, all I have to do now could be increase these notes into full sentences and hyperlink them collectively! Whereas I write, I need to, always, bear in mind my place: species loss is a vital downside, however world warming is much more necessary, and they’re additionally linked.
So right here’s my essay:
My Mannequin Essay
The lack of pure habitats, partially because of intensive agriculture and industrial-scale mining in some components of the world, in addition to urbanisation, has put the survival of many species of crops and animals below risk. Whereas that is definitely a serious concern, is that this probably the most urgent environmental downside that we should always take care of?
I definitely really feel that humanity has an ethical obligation to safeguard the survival of various species of fauna and flora. The lack of any species is everlasting and implies that future generations won’t be able to understand the wonders of a various pure world. For instance, the tragic extinction of the dodo is one thing which we nonetheless lament even as we speak.
Furthermore, it could possibly have an effect on us detrimentally too. Many natural cures are derived from crops, and so the destruction of rainforests may simply have a detrimental impact on the manufacturing of medicinal medicine. As well as, we’re a part of a pure meals chain, so the lack of animals, equivalent to fish, means we could have much less meals sooner or later.
Finally although, there’s a far wider downside that must be addressed: world warming. On account of emissions of greenhouse gases, equivalent to CO2 and methane, world temperatures are rising and we danger seeing runaway heating. This may result in quite a lot of issues, together with flooding, excessive climate and drought, but in addition the extinction of species. Certainly, polar bears are already struggling to outlive due to the lack of polar ice caps because of rising temperatures.
In different phrases, working to safeguard the survival of the pure world with out tackling world warming could be fully ineffective, so it’s not likely a case of which one is extra necessary: all environmental points are finally interconnected, and so we have to take a holistic method to the problem.
304 phrases
My Feedback
Process response: had I simply argued that world warming was extra necessary than species loss, it could be adequate for a Band 7 or 8 for TR, however I went additional: I argued that each issues are necessary, and that they’re linked. It’s a extra developed place, and I feel worthy of a Band 9. However explaining this place requires some superior language, so it’s difficult for a lot of college students to do properly.
Vocabulary: I desperately wished to make use of the phrase “wildlife” someplace! (For those who don’t understand it, fauna = animals, flora = flowers. There’s additionally lots of pure collocation on this essay, and these phrases have exact which means:
- intensive agriculture
- industrial-scale mining
- below risk
- probably the most urgent environmental downside
- has an ethical obligation to
- natural cures
There’s some repetition of phrases: loss, survival and species are repeated, however this isn’t an issue. I’ve tried to paraphrase the place applicable (e.g. “pure world” as a substitute of “species”).
General, the essay makes use of “pure and complicated management” of vocabulary, with no errors (so far as I can inform!) so it’s at a Band 9 stage.
I hope you want my mannequin essay. Keep in mind, it’s only ONE doable response out of an infinite variety of doable responses to this job. If you wish to learn extra about this matter, right here’s a nice article by The Guardian newspaper concerning the lack of bugs.
Learn some extra IELTS essay questions.
For those who suppose that different folks will discover this convenient, please share it. And please add your individual feedback and questions beneath.
Associated Posts